Method first, conclusions later.
We publish what is verifiable, including what is not yet established. Every claim carries a label showing how firm the underlying evidence is.
The process gap
Review version 0.98. A method proposal, not a research result.
How do you reconstruct a pathway that runs across several organisations, and can you establish where it stalled and why? This proposal describes the design, the source classification and the limits of what such a reconstruction could ever show.
Medication in the chain
In development. No publication yet.
Who remains responsible when a prescription turns into long-term use, tapering or standstill? This line examines prescribing, withdrawal and the connection with illegal availability of oxycodone. The research question and source base are still being sharpened.
How we label evidence
Publications use labels so a reader can see per statement how firm the basis is: measured, calculated, correlation, case report, or unknown. A number that looks precise is not automatically a national fact, and we mark it accordingly.
Why publications are in Dutch
The research concerns Dutch healthcare, Dutch registries and Dutch legislation. Translating it would suggest a general applicability the material does not have. If you are working on comparable research and want to discuss the method, please get in touch.